Welcome
Research
Publications
Talks
BeSci Lab
BeSci Consulting
Blog
Resources
for research
for teaching
Peer-reviewing
Peer reviewers’ dilemmas: a qualitative exploration of decisional conflict in the evaluation of grant applications in the medical humanities and social sciences
Independent evaluations of grant applications by subject experts are an important part of the peer-review system. However, little is …
Gaëlle Vallée-Tourangeau
,
Ana Wheelock
,
Tushna Vandrevala
,
Priscilla Harries
Preprint
PDF
Project
DOI
Applying Social Judgment Theory to better understand what peer reviewers pay attention to when evaluating fellowship grant proposals.
While research has revealed startling inconsistencies and lack of agreement in reviewers’ evaluations of grant proposals (Pier et al., …
gaelle-vallee-tourangeau
Last updated on Aug 10, 2022
Project
Slides
Follow
Slides
Applying Social Judgment Theory to better understand what peer reviewers pay attention to when evaluating fellowship grant proposals.
gaelle-vallee-tourangeau
Last updated on Aug 10, 2022
Towards Outstanding Research Reviews
This research programme is funded by the Wellcome Trust Research on Research Awards (2019-2022) and aims to better understand how peer reviewers evaluate research proposals in grant funding applications.
Cite
×
