Decision-making

Independent evaluations of grant applications by subject experts are an important part of the peer-review system. However, little is …

While research has revealed startling inconsistencies and lack of agreement in reviewers’ evaluations of grant proposals (Pier et al., …

Applying Social Judgment Theory to better understand what peer reviewers pay attention to when evaluating fellowship grant proposals.

Rates of flu vaccination among healthcare professionals often remain lower than recommended guidelines. We tested whether …

This research programme is funded by the Wellcome Trust Research on Research Awards (2019-2022) and aims to better understand how peer reviewers evaluate research proposals in grant funding applications.

In this chapter , we propose a systemic model of thinking (SysTM) to account for higher cognitive operations such as how an agent makes …

This research programme aims to better understand the levels of autonomous drive towards vaccination and vaccination advocacy among health care professionals.

Two experiments examined whether different task ecologies influenced insight problem solving. The 17 animals problem was employed, a …

This research programme focuses on the cognitive processes, heuristics, and biases which underpin judgements of risk and uncertainty, choices, decision-making, problem solving and hypothesis testing.